euclase:

I don’t know about you, but stuff like slash and shipping two male characters? That’s not some weird, childish, feverish girl-crush thing. That’s not me being horny thinking about two men kissing, and I’m pretty tired of being labeled that way, as some frothing, hormonal fangirl. As crazy.

Men get to be default characters. In everything. They aren’t tied down. They aren’t “the girl.” They’re interesting.

They’re equal. They’re free.

When I ship male characters, it’s because I want that for myself. I wish I could be a man in a relationship with another man—because they don’t have the same baggage, the same limitations. They aren’t trophies or objects or accessories. I want to be equal and free, too. It’s the hottest thing I can imagine, really. And the fucking saddest thing,  because I won’t ever get it. I will never get to be that equal or free. 

I wish I could have a Dean/Cas or a Derek/Stiles or a House/Wilson for myself, and it’s not cute, and it’s not frivolous, and it’s nothing to laugh about. 

But I’m a girl, so I’m stuck.

So that’s why I slash. And I’ll knock your teeth in if you treat me like I’m silly for doing it.

This. A million times this. Thanks for putting it in words.

But I want to add just a eensy-weensy footnote: I do find it really hot when two good-looking dudes kiss. It’s not the only reason I ship Dean/Cas or Garrett/Anders, obviously; in fact, it’s pretty far down on the list of reasons why I find these relationships so endlessly fascinating.

But I think as women, we tend to be shamed (and we shame ourselves) enough as is for our sexual preferences. So I won’t apologize for liking it when good looking men get filthy with each other, and I won’t pretend that I don’t like it (not that you were pretending anything, euclase!) if someone tries to shame me about it. And they’ve tried. Oh, how they have tried.

The way I figure it, if a guy can be aroused by two girls having sex without anyone accusing him of being weird and silly, or a crazy, childish fanboy, then surely I can demand the same treatment for the equal and opposite situation.

(via euclase-deactivated20120926)

  1. satouxyoshida reblogged this from wayward-angel
  2. jongdirection reblogged this from twenty-fourteen
  3. rosespud reblogged this from almaasi
  4. grotesqueenchantment reblogged this from almaasi
  5. thehorseofadifferentcolour reblogged this from almaasi
  6. eliriskat reblogged this from almaasi
  7. arora-kayd reblogged this from almaasi
  8. captain-of-the-friend-ship reblogged this from almaasi
  9. wayward-angel reblogged this from almaasi
  10. almaasi reblogged this from flutiebear
  11. thewonderofliving reblogged this from flutiebear
  12. bark-and-baroque reblogged this from lostloona
  13. puppychild reblogged this from twenty-fourteen
  14. selfihateyouithink reblogged this from flutiebear
  15. saebrial reblogged this from flutiebear and added:
    Well put
  16. pingki15 reblogged this from flutiebear and added:
    THIS.
  17. iblurb reblogged this from mostly10
  18. yesmrspatmore reblogged this from thetimelady
  19. the-we-of-babcock reblogged this from milkykittentea
  20. while-my-tardis-gently-weeps reblogged this from ohcaptain1mycaptain
  21. castheasstiel reblogged this from stripedtabby
  22. rainbowstan reblogged this from flutiebear
  23. sky-blue44 reblogged this from durinesque
  24. everythingiveseentwice reblogged this from enochianwarbirds and added:
    Wow, that’s some deep psychological analysis right there. Hmm…
  25. minniemoments reblogged this from itsabouttfw
  26. msamericachavezz reblogged this from flutiebear
  27. thefandomproject reblogged this from dragonsigma and added:
    People who look into shows and see this incredible depth and emotion don’t deserve to be treated like fools. Because...